Woodcock-Johnson^® III Complete

Authors: Dr. Richard W. Woodcock, Dr. Kevin S. McGrew, and Dr. Nancy Mather
	Type:	Two distinct, co-normed batteries
	Purpose:	Provides a comprehensive system for measuring general intellectual ability, specific cognitive abilities, scholastic aptitude, oral language, and academic achievement.
	Ages:	2 to 90+ years
	Times:	Varies, about 5 minutes per test; Cognitive Standard 7 tests (35–45 minutes); Achievement Standard 11 tests (55–65 minutes).
	Scoring:	WJ III Compuscore® and Profiles Program and Report Writer allow you to score and report quickly and easily.

Woodcock-Johnson® III Private Training

Michael Herbert, Salt Lake City, Utah
E-mail: michaelh@updc.org

Background:

Michael Herbert has conducted over 500 individualized workshops and trained educational professionals in forty-seven school districts to administer and interpret the Woodcock-Johnson^® III and the BVAT. He is the Editor and frequent contributor to The Utah Special Educator, a journal for educational professionals who work with children and youth with disabilities. Mr. Herbert's collected articles regarding the use and interpretation of the WJ III^® can be found on-line at www.updc.org/specialeducator/index.html. Personnel development workshops are designed to meet the unique needs of the school district, agency or university, and range from intensive one-day sessions to ongoing seminars, classes and technical support.

Mr. Herbert is a personnel development Educational Specialist for the state of Utah with over twenty-seven years of experience with elementary, middle school, high school and university populations. In addition, he is a founding partner in Educational Diagnostic Services, a private practice clinic for young adults and adults with l earning problems. He has written and directed many state and federally funded research grants regarding assessment and educational services for students with diverse needs. His passion is in assisting teachers and clinicians to provide research-based instruction and reasonable accommodations, based on cognitive processing strengths, weaknesses, and functional limitations.